Carr And Marquis

1. Are there holes in Carrs arguments? If so, where? Argue your inclose in detail. 2. Are any of Carrs arguments consistent with the sourcing theories we gyre been developing to date in this class? Which? Explain in detail. 3. Marquis argument is based on a resourcefulness dependency line of thought. Does this make sense to you? Why or why not? Yes. As Marquis emphasizes, the IT commoditization cannot be comp bed with new(prenominal) commodities, want utilities, because the company success is highly dependent on the case of its IT resources, in such(prenominal) scale that the inefficiency of IT can exclusively strike down an entire system. In the current time, in fact, we are seeing the opposite direction, where IT, instead of being reasonable a resource, is part of the business discussion table at the executive level. This allows the company to use IT to generate competitive advantage, by pickings advantage of technology to enhance its pe ople productivity and optimize process, but tailoring the IT investment decision and contract jibe the overall company strategy.

It should be noted that is button up advantageous to outsource some specific tasks on the IT department, such as infrastructure and user support. However, the focus should be in repetitive tasks that although important, does not shape the governance strategy. The IT strategy and computer architecture decisions should hardly ever be outsourced. There are hostile examples of organizations that stepped back in outsourcing deals, because the advantages of such contracts, especially on costs, do not offset the cultural and strategy hardship that it brings. Th e organization should avoid making outsource! decisions purely based on costs, since there are many other risks involved. IT is still strategic for many organizations and yes, it does matter.If you want to get a full essay, arrest it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay