Ignorance and Negligence of Commanders at Pearl Harbor

Ignorance and negligence of armed forces commanders at os make\nThe lacquerese navy launched a storm struggle on US forces in bone Harbor on celestial latitude 7, 1941, killing thousands of US troops. This surprise attack played a key factor in the United States entering dry land War II. Because of the topical anesthetic commanders escape of attention and good judgment, the lacquerese had the ability to attack the nautical base and were winning in doing so. Primarily, the commanders unheeded the lucid exemplifications of an attack from the lacquerese and the current policy-making situation between lacquer and the United States. On the twenty-four hour period of the bombing, the commanders once again treat the obvious signs of an act. Because of this ignorance and negligence, Japan was successful in bombing bead Harbor.\n\nFirst of all, the local commanders at fall Harbor do by the obvious warnings of an attack from the Nipponese ad the current policy-making si tuation between Japan and the United States. The first obvious sign was the fact that Japan had been attacking southeastern Asia in company to expand their pudding stone and acquire valuable resources. Because of the restrictive nature of the United States navy, Japan felt the US was a threat. They felt the only federal agency to protect their territory was to detach the US navy. On November 24 and 27, 1941, majuscule sent warning to the commanders at Pearl Harbor. The local leaders in Pearl Harbor blatantly ignored these warning, including Admiral H.E. Kimmel and General W.C. goldbrick. They claimed howdy was not included in the warning even though the warning was meant for all peaceable commanders. Kimmel and Short felt they inevitable special(prenominal) instructions and strategies from uppercase in order to digest out successful fairishificatory measures. Thus, it can be argued that Washington could piddle been more specific in its warning. This vagueness can be n oted in the inwardness of November 27, 1941. The message from General Walter Short and the message from Admiral Huband E. Kimmel notwithstanding exemplifies Washingtons omit of specific information.\n\n\nFurthermore, the commanders in Pearl Harbor did not wear attention to the obvious signs of fight on the day of the attack. A primary example of these signs on the morning of the attack on Oahu, would be when a Japanese mid spring up submarine was patched and sunk by a US destroyer just outside of the entrance to the harbor. This should have been considered as a tremendous threat and defensive...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.